What Does Nonpartisan Actually Mean? A Guide for Higher Education Leaders and Educators
In an era of heightened political division, the term “nonpartisan” is often misunderstood or misused. Many assume it means disengaging from political or social issues altogether, but in fact, nonpartisan leadership is about maintaining a fair, and open approach to complex discussions.
For educators, institutional leaders, and organizations, upholding nonpartisanship is critical to fostering trust, intellectual rigor, and a culture of open inquiry. But what does that look like in practice? How can institutions ensure they enable pluralistic spaces for learning and discussion without being perceived as endorsing specific political ideologies?
Defining Nonpartisanship
At its core, nonpartisanship means:
Not taking sides in political debates or endorsing a party, candidate, or ideology. Institutions and leaders should not use their positions to influence political decisions or promote a specific agenda.
Creating a space for dialogue that is fair, balanced, and inclusive of multiple perspectives. Nonpartisan environments encourage discussion and exploration of various viewpoints.
Nonpartisanship vs. Neutrality
While nonpartisanship is often associated with neutrality, the two are not identical. Neutrality implies a lack of engagement, while nonpartisanship allows for active engagement with important issues in a way that is balanced and free from bias.
For example, a university choosing to remain neutral on an issue may decide not to host discussions about a controversial political topic at all. A nonpartisan institution, however, would facilitate open dialogue on the issue, ensuring that diverse viewpoints are represented fairly and that the discussion is rooted in facts rather than ideological persuasion.
For a deeper dive into how “neutrality” differs from “nonpartisanship” from a scholastic perspective, see: The World Is Politically Charged. Bring Those Conversations into the Classroom (Harvard Business Publishing Education)
Why Nonpartisanship Matters
A commitment to nonpartisanship provides several key benefits for institutions:
Enhanced credibility and trust – A reputation for fairness strengthens relationships with students, faculty, staff, and the broader community.
Improved academic integrity – Encouraging open discussion without ideological bias fosters genuine critical thinking.
Reduced polarization – A balanced approach helps prevent institutions from becoming battlegrounds for ideological conflict.
Stronger civic engagement – Equipping students and professionals with the ability to assess multiple viewpoints prepares them for informed participation in democracy.
What Nonpartisanship Is—and What It Is Not
Being nonpartisan means creating an environment where ideas can be explored without institutional bias. It does not mean avoiding important discussions, nor does it mean treating all viewpoints as equally valid when they lack factual grounding.
Examples of Partisan Behavior (Biased Leadership):
A university president publicly endorsing or criticizing a political candidate.
An institution pressuring faculty or staff to take a stance on a social or political issue.
Leadership disciplining or silencing faculty based on their political beliefs.
Examples of Nonpartisan Behavior (Unbiased Leadership):
Allowing faculty to facilitate open discussions about political issues without pushing an agenda.
Champion evidence-based positions and provide source transparency.
Emphasize active engagement with diverse sources of information rather than passive consumption.
Writing a letter of recommendation for a student in good standing who has been doxxed.
Challenges in Maintaining Nonpartisanship
While the principles of nonpartisanship are clear, applying them in real-world scenarios can be challenging. Leaders often face pressure from various stakeholders—students, faculty, staff, alumni, and donors—who may expect institutions to take a public stance on social or political issues.
For example, after a contentious election or during a major social movement, there may be calls for a university or organization to release a statement in support of one side or another. While acknowledging the impact of such events is important, it is equally critical that institutional messaging focuses on upholding its mission and democratic values, civil discourse, and inclusivity rather than taking a political position.
Additionally, some topics are inherently more politically charged than others. Issues such as free speech, diversity, and climate change often provoke strong opinions. Nonpartisan leadership requires careful navigation of these discussions, ensuring that policies and programming reflect fact-based, fair, and inclusive engagement rather than ideological alignment.
Further Reading: The Community Statement on Free and Open Academic Inquiry (American Council on Education) underscores the importance of free inquiry and robust debate as foundational to higher education.
How Leaders and Educators Can Uphold Nonpartisanship
Maintaining an unbiased institutional approach requires deliberate effort. The following four strategies can help:
1. Evaluate Your Language
Language can unintentionally signal bias. Phrases like “safe space” or “harm” may carry ideological weight. Institutions should ensure clarity and neutrality in communication by defining terms and facilitating shared understanding rather than assuming universal agreement.
For example, rather than saying, “This space is a safe space,” facilitators can clarify:
“This is a space for open discussion, where all viewpoints will be heard and respected.”
2. Encourage Viewpoint Diversity
Nonpartisan spaces do not censor ideas—they encourage rigorous debate and exposure to multiple perspectives. Leaders should actively include a range of expert voices in discussions on key issues, ensuring representation across the ideological spectrum.
For instance, if a university hosts a panel on healthcare policy, it should include experts from different perspectives and backgrounds to provide a balanced discussion.
3. Separate Institutional Actions from Personal Views
Leaders and faculty members have personal opinions, but they must distinguish personal beliefs from their professional roles. Institutional policies, programming, and public statements should reflect neutrality rather than ideological alignment to maintain trust and inclusivity.
For example, while faculty members are free to express their personal political opinions outside of work, classroom discussions should be structured to encourage independent analysis rather than steer students toward a particular stance.
For guidelines on balancing free speech and open inquiry, see: The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE)
By maintaining an unbiased and intellectually open environment, institutions can prepare students to engage with complex societal issues in a way that is informed, thoughtful, and free from external pressure.
4. Model Respect for Debate and Discussion
Creating structured opportunities for constructive dialogue ensures that sensitive topics can be explored without hostility or partisanship. However, fostering nonpartisanship goes beyond facilitating discussion—it also requires practical engagement with diverse perspectives. Institutions should actively encourage respectful, evidence-based discourse by exposing students, faculty, and staff to a range of viewpoints in meaningful ways. This can be achieved by inviting speakers with differing perspectives to share insights on complex issues, partnering with community organizations to engage with people outside the institution, and providing students with opportunities for civic engagement that emphasize informed participation rather than advocating for a particular political stance. Additionally, interdisciplinary collaboration can enrich discussions by incorporating insights from multiple fields of study, helping participants see the broader implications of various perspectives.
By reinforcing open inquiry through both discussion and lived experience, institutions can cultivate an environment where respectful disagreement and diverse perspectives are valued as essential components of learning. Encouraging exposure to real-world perspectives strengthens the practice of nonpartisanship, making it an active, ongoing commitment rather than a passive principle.
The Role of Nonpartisan Leadership in Today’s Climate
In a time when many institutions face pressure to take explicit stances on political and social issues, true nonpartisan leadership is rare but essential. Upholding intellectual openness, fairness, and unbiased engagement is not about avoiding controversy—it is about building trust, credibility, and a culture of rigorous inquiry. A steadfast commitment to nonpartisanship does more than foster open dialogue; it also strengthens institutions during moments of uncertainty or crisis. By maintaining a fair and principled approach, organizations can navigate complex challenges without compromising their integrity or alienating key stakeholders.
For leaders and educators, the challenge is clear:
Can we create environments where ideas can be debated openly, fairly, and without ideological pressure?
If the goal is to prepare individuals for engaged and informed civic life, the answer must be yes.
At the Constructive Dialogue Institute, we provide evidence-based programs and tools to help institutions foster open, nonpartisan dialogue. Our research-driven approach equips leaders, educators, and organizations with the strategies needed to create spaces where all voices can be heard and respected. Learn more about how our campus programs can support your efforts in building a nonpartisan environment.
Follow Our Work
Sign up for our higher education newsletter to get regular updates on our research, product releases, and the science & practice of constructive dialogue.