
Why Higher Education Needs a Whole-Campus Approach to Constructive Dialogue
Imagine a campus where every conversation—inside and outside the classroom—builds bridges instead of walls. Where students, faculty, and leaders engage in dialogue that fosters understanding, encourages intellectual humility, and deepens a shared sense of purpose. This vision can’t be reached by simply implementing a one-time training program; it requires a systemic, whole-campus commitment to cultural transformation. It will also fail if it is focused on a single population. There must be a coordinated, systemic approach that engages students, faculty, and administration to create and sustain this culture.
The Constructive Dialogue Institute (CDI) has outlined our Theory of Change, based on research and deep experience. To enact this Theory of Change, CDI has developed tools and solutions to help drive change at each level.
The Research Behind Our Approach
When CDI launched, our primary tool was an online learning program designed to equip students with the mindsets and skill sets to engage across lines of difference. The immediate impact was clear—students who participated showed measurable improvements in these areas. However, a longitudinal study revealed an important challenge: while students retained these gains a month after completing the program, the impact declined somewhat by the six-month mark.To understand why, we conducted follow-up qualitative interviews with two groups: students who maintained their skills and those who did not. The key difference? The students who sustained their growth were in environments that consistently reinforced these skills—whether through leadership programs, diverse workplaces, with their families, or community engagement. Those who lacked these reinforcing structures saw their initial gains fade.
Why Skills Need Reinforcement
This finding aligns with broader research on behavioral interventions: long-term impact requires environmental support. Just as individuals leaving rehabilitation programs may relapse if their daily environments don’t change, students will struggle to retain constructive dialogue skills unless their broader campus culture supports them.
A workshop or training can lead to the development of valuable skills, but these skills need to be regularly practiced in order to become habits. Without a sustained ecosystem of reinforcement, students, faculty, and staff will revert to familiar patterns. That’s why our work goes beyond training individuals—we focus on shifting entire institutional cultures to make constructive dialogue the norm rather than the exception.
The Whole-Campus Model: A Sustainable Approach to Culture Change
Our approach is rooted in addressing the whole campus ecosystem. Rather than expecting individuals to “swim upstream” against prevailing cultural currents, we work with institutions to change the current itself—creating environments where constructive dialogue is practiced regularly and reinforced at every level. This requires coordinated interventions in multiple areas:
Students: We provide scalable, learning programs in constructive dialogue. These can be leveraged in classrooms, and co-curricular settings such as orientation, residential life, and among student leaders.
Faculty & Staff: We have training programs tailored to faculty and staff to help them facilitate conversations and create environments that support dialogue and open inquiry.
Administration: We have programs that help leaders of colleges and universities integrate dialogue-based approaches into their strategic priorities, policies, and campus culture initiatives.
The 25% Tipping Point: When Culture Change Becomes Self-Sustaining
Research from the University of Pennsylvania suggests that when 25% of a population adopts a behavior, it reaches a tipping point where the behavior spreads naturally. Our whole-campus approach is designed to reach and surpass this threshold, creating momentum for lasting institutional change. By embedding constructive dialogue into everyday campus life, we ensure that future cohorts of students enter an environment where these skills become second nature, shaping the very fabric of campus culture. One pathway to achieving this is through comprehensive campus-wide initiatives, like those undertaken by Ohio Wesleyan University (OWU).
Ohio Wesleyan University (OWU) has taken a bold, campus-wide approach to embedding civil discourse training, earning recognition from The Coalition for Transformational Education. Partnering with CDI, OWU has integrated dialogue programs at multiple levels—providing students with micro-credentialing, equipping faculty and staff with advanced training, and engaging leadership through CDI’s Leadership Institute. By prioritizing dialogue across all facets of campus life, OWU exemplifies how institutions can reach the 25% tipping point, ensuring that constructive dialogue becomes an enduring part of their institutional culture.
Shaping the Future of Higher Education
Higher education institutions have a unique opportunity—and responsibility—to shape the next generation of leaders, thinkers, and citizens. Creating a culture of constructive dialogue isn’t just about preparing students for the classroom; it’s about preparing them for a lifetime of civic engagement, leadership, and problem-solving in an increasingly complex world.
Our programs are designed to help institutions make this vision a reality. By embracing a whole-campus approach, colleges and universities can create environments where dialogue, intellectual humility, and open inquiry thrive.
If your institution is ready to take the next step in fostering a culture of constructive dialogue, CDI would love to partner with you. Let’s build a stronger, more resilient campus community—together.
Follow Our Work
Sign up for our higher education newsletter to get regular updates on our research, product releases, and the science & practice of constructive dialogue.