Can AI Help Students Practice Difficult Conversations?

Join us on July 9 for a live webinar.

Register Now
Two faculty exploring roots of differences

Exploring the Roots of our Ideological Differences

A Workshop for Faculty & Staff

Exploring the Roots of Our Ideological Differences is a two-hour, highly interactive workshop that combines research, reflection, and practical exercises to explore what drives ideological differences and why disagreements can escalate so quickly.

Participants examine the psychology behind belief formation, group division, and moral conflict to better understand how beliefs are formed, how we argue, and why disagreements can spiral. The workshop explores how moral beliefs are formed, why people often misunderstand those who see the world differently, and what it takes to begin bridging those divides.

Participants leave with practical tools for listening for values and engaging constructively in dialogue across differences.

A basic introduction to the key mindsets behind constructive dialogue

A workshop to develop alignment with stakeholder groups like faculty or staff

Focus on inquiry and free expression

Workshop Format

Exploring the Roots of Our Ideological Differences is offered as a private in-person workshop for faculty and staff.

  • Length: 2 hours

  • Format: Live, in person

  • Delivery: Delivered in-person in conjunction with another program

The workshop combines research insights, structured dialogue practice, and applied facilitation techniques.

You Should Attend This Program if You Are

  • A campus community beginning to build a shared language around dialogue and disagreement
  • Faculty or staff with limited prior exposure to dialogue frameworks or moral psychology
  • An organization looking to surface why disagreements escalate before moving to skills-based dialogue training
Website images 7

Concepts Covered

Understand how our fast, intuitive thinking and slower, more deliberate reasoning both shape our judgments, decisions, and conversations.

Learn a simple metaphor for how our rational mind and intuitive instincts work together—and why emotion often leads the way.

Recognize our tendency to seek out, interpret, and remember information that reinforces what we already believe.

Explore how our natural inclination to favor people we see as "us" can shape perceptions of those we see as "them."

Discover why people often misunderstand those with different political or social views, assuming they are more extreme than they really are.

Identify the underlying values that shape our views, and using them to explain why people can hold different positions and beliefs.

Build the ability to understand the moral values that motivate people whose views differ from your own, even when you disagree with them.

Practice identifying the underlying values and concerns driving someone's perspective rather than focusing only on their positions.

Develop practical tools for approaching disagreement with curiosity, asking better questions, and having more constructive conversations across differences.

Two women walking on campus

Common Use Cases

  • Introduce constructive dialogue to faculty or staff
  • Kick-off programming for campus-wide discourse or civil dialogue efforts
  • Introductory program prior to more advanced offerings or longer-term CDI partnerships
  • Campus climate or free expression convenings where institutional stakeholders need shared framing before engaging on contentious topics

By the end of this program, participants will:

  • Understand the psychology behind how the brain shapes what we believe, how we argue, and why this can lead disagreements to spiral
  • Learn how moral beliefs are shaped, why we misjudge people who see the world differently, and what it takes to start to bridge those divides
DFC small

The program was excellent, and the facilitators were top notch. This is the best training program I have experienced, both in substance and process.

Associate Professor

I love how much territory we covered and I feel quite a bit more comfortable at the idea of facilitating a more challenging group conversation.

Assistant Dean

Engaging in 1:1 practice really pushed me out of my comfort zone to actually use the skills and strategies and feel confident in facilitating dialogue.

Staff Member
Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies. Please click accept to continue, or visit our Privacy Policy to learn more.